<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VimStreet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vimstreet.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vimstreet.com</link>
	<description>Improving businesses through lean business analysis, agile requirements, agile software development and process improvement.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning from Washington, the Inauguration, and the Constitution by Laura Brandau</title>
		<link>http://vimstreet.com/learning-from-washington-the-inauguration-and-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Brandau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vimstreet.com/blog/?p=34#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi Jake,

Nice post. You bring to bear the point that although so much has changed since the Constitution was ratified, so little has changed on a fundamental level. We can learn a lot from how our Founders approached change itself as well as the process they went through to deliver a work product. 

On a somewhat related note, I&#039;m in the middle of reading Ben Franklin&#039;s autobiography.  He focuses the better part of a chapter talking about how he learned to write, the lengths he went to improve his prosaic writing, and the benefits writing created for him throughout his professional and political career.  I think if Franklin were alive today he might just be a blogger!  Our tools change radically; fundamental aspects of being human and engaging other humans don&#039;t change quite so much.

Keep on writing.
Laura
www.bridging-the-gap.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jake,</p>
<p>Nice post. You bring to bear the point that although so much has changed since the Constitution was ratified, so little has changed on a fundamental level. We can learn a lot from how our Founders approached change itself as well as the process they went through to deliver a work product. </p>
<p>On a somewhat related note, I&#8217;m in the middle of reading Ben Franklin&#8217;s autobiography.  He focuses the better part of a chapter talking about how he learned to write, the lengths he went to improve his prosaic writing, and the benefits writing created for him throughout his professional and political career.  I think if Franklin were alive today he might just be a blogger!  Our tools change radically; fundamental aspects of being human and engaging other humans don&#8217;t change quite so much.</p>
<p>Keep on writing.<br />
Laura<br />
<a href="http://www.bridging-the-gap.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stopping the Fake Subject Matter Expert (SME) from Derailing Your Project by Jake Calabrese, CBAP, CSM</title>
		<link>http://vimstreet.com/stopping-the-fake-subject-matter-expert-sme-from-derailing-your-project/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Calabrese, CBAP, CSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vimstreet.com/blog/?p=33#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Lisa, thanks for the comment.  I agree that often there is no expert or the expert is too busy.  Like you, I find you can work around that issue by knowing they are not the expert.  Then at least we can adjust the meetings, demos, and approval steps with the reality that we have not been working with an expert.  Perhaps we need to have a SMN (subject matter novice).  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, thanks for the comment.  I agree that often there is no expert or the expert is too busy.  Like you, I find you can work around that issue by knowing they are not the expert.  Then at least we can adjust the meetings, demos, and approval steps with the reality that we have not been working with an expert.  Perhaps we need to have a SMN (subject matter novice).  <img src='http://vimstreet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stopping the Fake Subject Matter Expert (SME) from Derailing Your Project by Lisa Breytspraak</title>
		<link>http://vimstreet.com/stopping-the-fake-subject-matter-expert-sme-from-derailing-your-project/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Breytspraak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vimstreet.com/blog/?p=33#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jake, this really resonates with what I’ve seen in a lot of organizations.  In some projects, SME has turned into a label for anyone who wants an opportunity to provide an opinion without doing any work.  One of the things we do is really minimize the number of people required in workshops, meetings or interviews to those who really need to provide input or approve findings.  I like your point of emphasizing the “expert” part of the acronym to ensure the right people are involved from the beginning.  That helps, but you may still be challenged if there is no expert or if the true expert’s time is so valuable he/she cannot be involved in the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jake, this really resonates with what I’ve seen in a lot of organizations.  In some projects, SME has turned into a label for anyone who wants an opportunity to provide an opinion without doing any work.  One of the things we do is really minimize the number of people required in workshops, meetings or interviews to those who really need to provide input or approve findings.  I like your point of emphasizing the “expert” part of the acronym to ensure the right people are involved from the beginning.  That helps, but you may still be challenged if there is no expert or if the true expert’s time is so valuable he/she cannot be involved in the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Networking: Linked In– What Type of Networker are YOU? by Jake Calabrese, CBAP, CSM</title>
		<link>http://vimstreet.com/online-networking-linked-in%e2%80%93-what-type-of-networker-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Calabrese, CBAP, CSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vimstreet.com/blog/?p=25#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Wow, quite a few comments about this post!  Not kidding!  All of them were emailed or sent through Linked In however.  One on Plaxo with the feed there!  Feel free to post things here if you like as well!  Interesting conversations and comments...  I&#039;ll add some to upcoming posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, quite a few comments about this post!  Not kidding!  All of them were emailed or sent through Linked In however.  One on Plaxo with the feed there!  Feel free to post things here if you like as well!  Interesting conversations and comments&#8230;  I&#8217;ll add some to upcoming posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

